Renninger v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*172GIVENS, Justice.
Plaintiffs (appellants here) own certain real estate in Latah County purchased for and used as a recreation park, dance hall, cafe and home.
Highway No. 95 is a public highway crossing the Palouse River on adjacent land. In 1946 and 1947, the Department of Public Works constructed a concrete bridge with approaches across the Palouse River, replacing an old bridge, and in so doing the highway was raised in grade and the same acted as a dam partially obstructing the natural flow of the river, causing it to overflow lands owned by the plaintiffs during high water and freshet…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Hughes v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
- Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Moon v. North Idaho Farmers Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.