Legal Opinion

Renninger v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1950No. 7567PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*172GIVENS, Justice.

Plaintiffs (appellants here) own certain real estate in Latah County purchased for and used as a recreation park, dance hall, cafe and home.

Highway No. 95 is a public highway crossing the Palouse River on adjacent land. In 1946 and 1947, the Department of Public Works constructed a concrete bridge with approaches across the Palouse River, replacing an old bridge, and in so doing the highway was raised in grade and the same acted as a dam partially obstructing the natural flow of the river, causing it to overflow lands owned by the plaintiffs during high water and freshet…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hughes v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Moon v. North Idaho Farmers Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API