Legal Opinion

Ambrosini v. Alisal Sanitary District

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1957No. Civ. 17706PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Plaintiffs filed this action for damages to a celery crop grown on land owned by the plaintiff Ferrasci under a contract with the plaintiff Ambrosini, on the counts of nuisance and inverse condemnation, alleging that the damage was due to the overflow of a sewer outfall line owned by the defendant, a public corporation, organized pursuant to Health and Safety Code, sections 6400 et seo. The defendant appeals from the judgment on a jury verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiffs on both counts, and assigns as error the order of the trial court overruling defendant’s demurrer, the orders…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API