Mulder v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
From the findings of the trial court the following facts appear: The plaintiff was the owner of lot one in tract No. 2138, at San Pedro, in the City of Los Angeles. Lot one is on the south side of Third Street, in the block next east of Cabrillo Street. The intersection of Second and Cabrillo Streets is northwesterly from plaintiff’s lot, and is on ground higher than plaintiff’s lot, so that the surface flow of water runs southeasterly from said Third Street intersection, down through a ravine in which plaintiff’s land is located. At the time of said injury (on or about March 1, 1926), and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Dick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by15 opinions
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Behr v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Plaza v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Watson v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.