Legal Opinion

Conniff v. City of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1885No. 8543PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries to plaintiff’s lot and building caused by grading Montgomery Avenue, in the mode provided for grading streets in the general statute in regard thereto. It is averred in the complaint that in grading the street mentioned an embankment was formed fifteen feet above the plaintiff’s property and the contiguous lots, by which the water that ran in a water-course crossing the street was permanently stopped in its flow and backed upon plaintiff’s lot causing damage to it and the building thereon; that the street was thus made in accordance with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Bonner v. WelbornSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  3. Green v. SwiftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Phinizy v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  5. Shafter v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API