Legal Opinion

Lampe v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1899No. S. F. No. 982PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. William R. Daingerfield, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Action to recover damages from defendant. Demurrer sustained to complaint. Plaintiff declined to amend and judgment was entered for defendant. This appeal is from the judgment. The complaint, after alleging that defendant is a municipal corporation, states that defendant, in accordance with law, established the official grade of Sanchez street, between Liberty and Twenty-first streets, and thereafter proceeded to fill in and raise said Sanchez street about five feet above its natural and original grade, and about five feet above the natural level of plaintiff’s lot, thus causing an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Lynch v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Stanford v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Waters v. Village of Bay ViewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Corcoran v. City of BeniciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hume v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Town of Cloverdale v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Dick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. City of Globe v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API