Legal Opinion

Granone v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1965No. Civ. 27280PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

Defendants County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Flood Control District appeal from a judgment entered against them, after trial by jury, in favor of plaintiffs, for damages in the sum of $77,000, with interest in the sum of $32,709.12 and costs in the sum of $10,186.75, or a total of $119,895.87.

Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for new trial were heard and denied. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial.

The record on appeal presents a…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API