Stanford v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. J. B. 0. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Plaintiffs were the occupants of the basement of a building No. 720 Mission street, which extended back to the southerly side of Jessie street, and had stored therein a large quantity of wall paper and other goods used in their business.
In the early part of 1888 the defendant caused a sewer to be laid in Jessie street from the center of fourth street easterly to its termination in a cut de sac at the westerly line of the Grand Opera House, which extends entirely across Jessie street, just east of the premises occupied by plaintiffs. The westerly end of said sewer connected with "a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Reardon v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Seifert v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Ashley v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Los Angeles Brick & Clay Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Heier v. KrullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Ambrosini v. Alisal Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.