Reid v. Clay
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. George H. Bahrs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
—The plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant, in the court below, for the sum of $115.07,—the amount of a street-assessment on land of defendant in San Francisco,—with interest and costs, and the sum of $15 at torney’s fees, all of which is adjudged to be a lien on the defendant’s land. The appeal is from an order denying the defendant a new trial. The facts of the case will be most -conveniently stated in connection with the several points as they are discussed.
The Plaintiff’s Case. — On the trial, the “ Certificate of the City Engineer,” “ Assessment, Diagram, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- McDonald v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- O'Dea v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Hazard, Gould & Co. v. RosenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- MacDonnell v. California Lands Inc.California Supreme Court · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.