Legal Opinion

MacDonnell v. California Lands Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1940No. L. A. 16771PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The amended complaint is in two counts, the first of which is in the usual form of an action to quiet title. In the second count, it is alleged that defendant, California Lands, Inc., was the owner of said real property and agreed to sell the same to plaintiff for the sum of $6,000: $700 in cash and the balance to be represented by a promissory note for $5,300, secured by a trust deed upon said real property. Pursuant to said agreement, defendant executed a deed of said real property and plaintiff paid to defendant the sum of $700, and executed and delivered to defendant a promissory note in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hazard, Gould & Co. v. RosenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Reid v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ferroni v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Acosta v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Miller v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Towt v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API