Hazard, Gould & Co. v. Rosenberg
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Actions to enforce six several mechanics’ liens were consolidated. The property against which the liens were sought was owned by appellants Rosenberg and Calkins. The National Surety Company was sued upon a contractor’s bond given by the Chaffey Concrete Construction Company, under the provisions of section 1183 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to protect Rosenberg and Calkins against liens for labor or materials. One of the lien claimants was nonsuited and is not a party to this appeal. The others were given judgments against the property owners and a personal judgment against the surety upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Tibbetts v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Thompson v. MacHadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Goodro v. TarkeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Wand Corp. v. San Gabriel Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Harden v. Skinner & HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.