Legal Opinion

O'Dea v. Mitchell

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1904No. L.A. No. 1259PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an action to foreclose the lien of a certain street assessment against lots of defendant Mitchell for certain work done on Sixth Street, between Fremont Avenue and Bixel Street, in the city of Los Angeles. Judgment was for plaintiff in the court below, and defendants appeal from the judgment. We do not think that any of the contentions of appellants for a reversal are maintainable.

No doubt, interested parties sometimes succeed in forcing premature improvements and imposing on lot-owners burdens not at the time called for by the conditions surrounding the property affected. But…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. German Savings & Loan Society v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Morey v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Jennings v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Dressman v. Farmers' & Traders' National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  5. Wingate v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hershey v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. City of Bartlesville v. HolmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. County of Riverside v. WhitlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Nalle v. EavesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API