Williams v. Bergin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. 0. B. Heb-bard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action upon a street assessment. The board of supervisors of San Francisco ordered “ that granite curbs be laid on Francisco street between Mason and Taylor streets where not already laid, and that the roadway thereof be paved with basalt blocks where not already so paved,” and a contract therefor awarded to the plaintiffs was on March 1, 1892, entered into between them and the superintendent of streets. The time fixed for the completion of the contract was sixty days from its date. It is alleged in the complaint that the work was completed according to the terms of the contract, within this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palmer v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- High v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Burlingame TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- McDonald v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Gossard v. GossardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- County of San Luis Obispo v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.