Bolton v. Gilleran
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco passed a resolution of intention June 1, 1891, to construct sewers in Fell street, and certain connecting streets, “ according to plans and specifications prepared by Charles S. Tilton, city engineer.” After an order for said improvement of the streets had been passed, the board of supervisors caused notice for sealed proposals to do the work to be given, and, *247upon receiving bids therefor, awarded the contract to the respondents, Conklin & Co. After the completion of their contract the superintendent of streets made an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phelps v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Thompson v. . SchermerhornNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Foss v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- McCrowell v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
- Hydes v. JoyesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Dallas v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Quinchard v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Davis v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Shapard v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1914
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.