Hellman v. Shoulters
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of. the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion, of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
After a re-examination of this case by the court in Bank, we are satisfied with the views expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Temple, filed upon the hearing of the case in Department Two; and that opinion, with the suggestions which we deem it proper here to add in response to the petition for a hearing in Bank, will stand as the opinion of the court.
1. Counsel strenuously contends that the bonds in question cannot be considered as the bonds of the municipality, but that they are, in legal effect, the obligations of the several property owners, or are not the obligations of any one. We…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Seaboard Acceptance Corp. v. ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.