Legal Opinion

Chase v. Trout

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1905No. L.A. No. 1217PublishedCited by 108 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The defendant appeals from a judgment taken upon his default, and from an order refusing to vacate the default and judgment.

The complaint sets forth a cause of action to quiet title. The defendant's claim is alleged to consist of certain bonds for an assessment for street-work, issued in pursuance of the laws commonly known as the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Castillo v. McConnicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ex parte GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. People ex rel. Jackson v. Suburban RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API