McDonald v. Conniff
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and Couuty of San Francisco, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action to foreclose the lien of a street assessment in the city and county of San Francisco.
At the trial the plaintiff offered in evidence the assessment, diagram, warrant, certificate of engineer, with the affidavit of demand and non-payment indorsed upon the warrant, to the introduction of which the defendants objected upon the grounds “ that the same were immaterial, irrelevant, and incompetent, because the assessment is void on its face, as only a part of the lots on Tenth Street, between Folsom and Harrison Streets, *388were assessed; and, also, that the diagram, did not show on which side…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Iowa Railroad Land v. SoperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- In the Matter of the Application of ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Ferguson v. . RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- County of Los Angeles v. HurlbutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- In Re FinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.