Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Trukositz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1992No. OSB 88-89; SC S37583PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an automatic and de novo review of a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. ORS 9.536; 1 BR 10.1; BR 10.6. The Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused in five separate causes of complaint, with violations of twelve different disciplinary rules. The trial panel concluded that the accused was guilty of violating former DRs 5-105 (A) and (B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, but that he was not guilty of the other charged violations. We agree with the trial panel’s findings as to the Bar’s charges against the accused.

The trial panel determined that the accused should be suspended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandsnessOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReckerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SamuelsOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API