Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1985No. OSB 81-83 SC S30430PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon the complaint of Gerald Smith (Smith), a former client, the accused was charged by the Oregon State Bar with conflicts of interest and assisting his client in illegal or fraudulent conduct. The amended complaint listed five charges in three causes of complaint. The first cause related to transactions between Tri-Chem Corporation (Tri-Chem) and Merchants Building Maintenance, Inc. (Merchants) in 1978. The Bar alleged that the accused violated DR 5-105: (1) by representing both the buyer and seller in a land sale contract; and (2) by representing Victor King (King), Smith, Tri-Chem and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Supove v. Densmoor Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Meyer v. NormanWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kidney Association of Oregon v. FergusonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API