Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1993No. OSB 89-61, 90-11, 90-135; SC S39378PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an automatic and de novo review of a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. ORS 9.536;1 BR 10.1; BR 10.6. The Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused in eight causes of complaint with violation of twelve disciplinary rules and one statute. The trial panel found the accused guilty of violating six different disciplinary rules and imposed a sanction of suspension from the practice of law for six months. On review, the accused challenges the trial panel’s findings of guilt and its recommended sanction. The Bar challenges the trial panel’s findings of not guilty on two disciplinary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API