Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Davenport
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 2002No. OSB 97-138; SC S47245PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (the Bar) alleged that lawyer John P. Davenport (the accused) knowingly, made several false statements under oath and repeatedly asserted the lawyer-client privilege when he knew that it did not apply, thereby violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 7-102(A)(5) (knowingly making false statement of law or fact in representation of client); DR 1-102(A)(4) (conduct prejudicial to administration of justice); and DR…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Michael Curtis KeysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court of Tennessee v. Charles Edward DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HostetterOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.