Legal Opinion
In Re Brown
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 26, 1998No. OSB 92-28; SC S43511PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the accused was charged with violating various provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility in the course of his real estate dealings with a long-time business associate. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused had violated four disciplinary rules — DR 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 7-101-(A)(3) (intentionally prejudicing client in course of professional relationship); DR 5-104(A) (business transaction with client having differing interests); and DR 5-101(A)(l)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Starkweather v. ShafferOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WeidnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Pollock v. DR Horton, Inc.-PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of WittemyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ObertOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.