Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Starr

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1998No. OSB 94-145; SC S41967PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a lawyer discipline proceeding. The Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleges that the accused violated DR 1-102(A)(3) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), former DR 9-101(A) (1992) (failing to deposit all funds of a client into a trust account), and former DR 9-101(B)(l) (1992) (failing promptly to notify a client of the receipt of the client’s funds). A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found the accused guilty of violating those disciplinary rules and concluded that disbarment is the appropriate sanction.

Because of the extent of the sanction,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API