Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hedrick

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. SC S32443PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline case, the accused was charged with violations of five sections of the Code of Professional Responsibility in connection with litigation concerning an estate. A trial panel found the accused guilty of violating four sections of the Code and recommended that he be suspended from the practice of law for 180 days. On automatic de novo review, ORS 9.536(2), we find the accused guilty of all five charges. We suspend the accused from the practice of law for two years.

All the allegations of impropriety by the accused arose out of two wills of a former client of the accused,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McCaffreyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re ClaussenOregon Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API