Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brandsness

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1985No. OSB 82-14 SC S30591PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1982, 1 the Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against the accused alleging that his representation of the husband in a dissolution proceeding constituted a conflict of interest in violation of DR 5-105, because the accused formerly had represented both the husband and wife in business matters and in the execution of mutual wills.

BACKGROUND

On April 19, 1979, John Zingg retained the accused. Mr. Zingg, a short time before, together with his wife, Anita, had acquired an option to buy a retail business in Klamath Falls, where the accused practices law. The accused, after meeting with Mr.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re BrownsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MumfordOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Liquilux Gas Corp. v. Humberto BerríosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API