Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Wolf

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1992No. OSB 88-49; SC S38205PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. The Oregon State Bar charges that the accused engaged in criminal conduct that reflected adversely on his fitness to practice law, in violation of DR 1-102(A)(2), 1 and that he continued professional employment even though his exercise of professional judgment reasonably could have been affected by his personal interests, in violation of former DR 5-101(A). 2

The trial panel found the accused guilty of violating DR 1-102(A)(2) and former DR 5-101(A) and ordered that he be suspended from the practice of law for three years, with the suspension stayed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WeidnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Matter of WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. In Re Conduct of HassenstabOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KirkmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API