Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Allen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1997No. OSB 94-191; SC S41729PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar (the Bar) filed a disciplinary complaint against the accused, alleging that he had violated ORS 9.460(1) (requiring a lawyer to support the laws of this state), ORS 9.527(1) (commission of conduct that would justify denial of admission to the Bar), ORS 9.527(2) (conviction of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude), DR 1-102(A)(1) (assisting another to violate disciplinary rules), DR 1-102-(A)(2) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s fitness to practice), and DR 1-102(A)(3) (engaging in conduct involving misrepresentation). A trial panel of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MeansOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. In Re RowellOregon Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DominguezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API