Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kluge

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2003No. OSB 98-23; SC S49334PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that David R. Kluge (the accused) violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 1-102(A)(4) (conduct prejudicial to administration of justice); DR 1-103(C) (noncooperation with disciplinary investigation); DR 5-101(A) (conflict of interest with lawyer’s self-interest); DR 5-102(C) (lawyer as witness other than in behalf of own client); DR 7-110(B) (contact with officials in adversary proceeding); and ORS 9.460(2)…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API