Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of White
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1991No. OSB 86-25, 87-34; SC S37007PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violations of several different Disciplinary Rules. The trial panel found him guilty of 11 violations and decided that he should be disbarred. The accused seeks review. We review the record de novo. ORS 9.536(3); BR 10.6. The Bar has the burden of establishing ethical misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. BR 5.2.
The Bar alleges that the accused violated the following standards of professional conduct:
“DR 1-102 Misconduct; Responsibility for Acts of Others.
“(A) It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
<(‡ * * * *
“(2) Commit a criminal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RochatOregon Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Ronald Lee WheelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James Robert AxtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard R. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.