Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kirkman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1992No. OSB 90-81; SC S38143PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a lawyer disciplinary proceeding involving Robert L. Kirkman (the accused). The Disciplinary Board Trial Panel recommended that the accused be disbarred. Based on our findings on de novo review, we order that the accused be disbarred.

The accused was admitted to practice law in Oregon in 1968. After meritorious service in the armed forces, the accused entered the private practice of law in Portland in 1972. He had a good reputation as a lawyer.

The accused married Susan Kirkman in 1967. They had four children. During the marriage, the accused became intimately involved with another…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WolfOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonhardtOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re GarveyOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McDonoughOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. MayorgaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KumleyOregon Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API