Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Haws

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1990No. 86-58, 86-121, 86-125, 86-127, 86-142, 87-9, 87-13 and 87-20; SC S33640PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline case, the accused was charged by a formal complaint of the Oregon State Bar, setting forth 16 causes of complaint involving 21 separate violations of 10 different provisions of the disciplinary rules.1 After three days of hearing, the Trial Panel found the accused guilty of eight separate violations. The decision of the Trial Panel was that the accused be suspended for 60 days, that such suspension be stayed, and that the accused be placed on probation for two years. The accused sought review in this court.

The alleged violations involve the activity of the accused in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RookOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HerefordOregon Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Discipline of StuhffNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kidney Association of Oregon v. FergusonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API