Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Conduct of Hassenstab

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1997No. OSB 94-37, 95-25; SC S43513PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found the accused guilty of two violations of former Disciplinary Rule (DR) 5-101(A) (1995) (nondisclosure of a conflict of interest based upon the lawyer’s own personal interests) and one violation of DR 1-102-(A)(2) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely upon the lawyer’s fitness to practice) and disbarred him. Upon de novo review, we also find the accused guilty of two violations of former DR 5-101(A) and one violation of DR 1-102(A)(2) and disbar him.

We find that the following facts have been…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WeidnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of WittemyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re BourcierOregon Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API