In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Weidner
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer discipline case, we determine de novo whether accused violated (1) two disciplinary rules prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, and knowingly making a false statement of law or fact, and (2) four disciplinary rules regulating conflicts of interest between a lawyer and a client or among multiple clients of the same lawyer. 1
Because the dishonesty or deception charges are not supported by evidence of any knowingly false statement, dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, we dismiss them, as did the Trial Panel. We also hold that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Matter of PetrieArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Crimson Trace Corp. v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Kidney Association of Oregon v. FergusonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Bowen v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- O'Kain v. LandressCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.