Legal Opinion

In Re Howard

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 19, 1995No. 77446PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

BENTON, Judge.

The Chief Disciplinary Counsel charges attorney Raymond Howard with “placing his own prurient interests paramount to and in conflict with his client’s best interest” and with “impugning the integrity of opposing counsel, the judge and the judicial process.” Rules of Professional Conduct 1.7(b), 2.1, 3.5(c), 8.2(a) and 8.)(e). After reviewing the *62evidence de novo, this Court orders Howard suspended for violating Rules 1.7(b) and 2.1.

I

On July 23, 1989, Wanda J. Sargent and her spouse hired Howard for an insurance claim. During the course of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Matter of WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. In re HowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  4. People v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. People v. GoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of CupplesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Paul J. Walwyn v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In Re CareySupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. In re KazanasSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  5. In Re YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API