Legal Opinion

Housewright v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1964No. Civ. 21229PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Plaintiff, Roy J. Housewright, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant, Pacific Far East Line, Inc., hereafter called Pacific, entered upon a verdict directed by the court in his action for damages for personal injuries.

Appellant was a maintenance mechanic employed by Ideal Cement Company, hereafter called Ideal. Pomeroy Construction Company had contracted with Ideal for the sale of 160,000 barrels of cement, and with Pacific for the transportation of the cement from Ideal’s Redwood City plant to the construction site in Guam. Pacific, under its agreement, was to unload the cement from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. McDonald v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Avner v. Longridge EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Rookard v. MexicoachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Stilson v. Moulton-Niguel Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Dorsic v. KurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Martin v. Phillips Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API