Legal Opinion

Stilson v. Moulton-Niguel Water District

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1971No. Civ. 10465PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GABBERT, J.

In this action to recover for personal injuries, defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Stilson.

Plaintiff’s employer, the American Bridge Division of the United States Steel Corporation (American Bridge), entered into a contract with appel lant Moulton-Niguel Water District (Moulton-Niguel) pursuant to which American Bridge was to construct large water tanks. Appellant Boyle Engineering Corp. (Boyle) served as supervising engineer for the project. During the course of construction of one of the tanks, plaintiff fell onto a steel floor from a 30-foot steel…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Toland v. Sunland Housing Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United States v. Alice L. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Lunde v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Holman v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API