Legal Opinion

Witt v. Jackson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1961No. L. A. 26484PublishedCited by 231 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*62TRAYNOR, J.

This action was brought by James Witt and Julius Grossman to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when the automobile in which they were riding was struck from the rear by one owned and operated by defendant Jackson. The City of Los Angeles, plaintiffs’ employer and owner of the vehicle that was being driven by Witt at the time of the accident, intervened to recover for the damage to its automobile and for workmen’s compensation benefits and medical expenses paid to plaintiffs. Judgment was entered on jury verdicts for defendant and against both plaintiffs and the city.…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by231 opinions

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API