Legal Opinion

Baugh v. Rogers

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1944No. L. A. 18805PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This case presents four fundamental problems, two of which, so far as the research of counsel and ourselves discloses, have not heretofore been considered by a court of last resort either in this state or elsewhere. The *204problems may be more conveniently defined after a statement of the essential facts.

Essential Facts and Legal Relationship of the Parties

The plaintiff was employed in a dual capacity by the defendant Rogers, who was a physician and surgeon and who, in addition to living quarters, maintained certain rooms in his residence as an office for the practice of his profession.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API