Legal Opinion

Rookard v. Mexicoach

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1982No. 79-3592PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge:

David and Fiona Rookard appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment for defendant-appellee Mexicoach in Appellants’ action to recover for personal injuries sustained in a catastrophic autobus accident which killed thirty persons, injured scores more, in Mexico on March 21, 1978. Appellants seek recovery as well against the two Mexican bus companies involved in that crash based on a default judgment entered against them. Their chances of a substantial recovery on the defaults, however, are effectively vitiated by a Mexican law limiting the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChattersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Dorkin v. American Express Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  5. Hines v. GarrettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smolnikar v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
  2. Eastern Trading Company v. Refco, Inc., and Refco Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Carlisle v. Ulysses Line Ltd., SADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Manes v. CoatsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. McCollum v. Friendly Hills Travel CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API