Legal Opinion

Avner v. Longridge Estates

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1969No. Civ. 32914PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchweitzer, J.

By a document entitled Order of Dismissal after Sustaining of Demurrer without Leave to Amend and Order Permitting Limited Amendment, the dismissal of plaintiffs’ first six causes of action was ordered. (Code Civ. Proc., § 581, subd. 3.) Amendment of the complaint as to the seventh and eighth causes of action directed against defendant Warren Company, who is not a party to this appeal, was permitted. The appeal is being taken from the judgment of dismissal in favor of defendants.

The complaint as to which the demurrers were sustained and which is before us for consideration is captioned…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Miller v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API