Martin v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*918Opinion
DEVINE, J.*
Plaintiff, William J. Martin, and intervener, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, appeal from a judgment rendered by the court in the first part of what was scheduled to be a bifurcated trial. The judgment, in favor of Phillips Petroleum Company, defendant, is based on the conclusion that Martin was a special employee of the defendant at the time he allegedly sustained injuries referred to in his complaint. The Hartford Company, as workmen’s compensation insurance carrier for Plant Maintenance, Inc., has paid all of the benefits required by the Labor Code. Plant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McFarland v. Voorheis-Trindle Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Housewright v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Dep't of Water & Power of L.A. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Plute v. Roadway Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Kowalski v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Bechtel v. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Larson v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.