Dorsic v. Kurtin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, J.
There are two appeals in the instant cause: one by plaintiff from the granting of defendants’ motions for a new trial after judgment for plaintiff on his action for damages, and one by defendant Richfield from the verdicts for plaintiff and for cross-defendant Kurtin on Richfield’s cross-complaint seeking indemnity.
The complaint alleged serious and permanent injuries to plaintiff as the result of negligence on the part of defendants, and the prayer sought substantial damages. The cross-complaint sought indemnity. The actions were tried to a jury. In the main action, a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Weeks v. Baker & McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Bostrom v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- In Re Coupon Clearing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Waller v. TJD, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Celli v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.