Legal Opinion

Dorsic v. Kurtin

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1971No. Civ. 35405PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHENS, J.

There are two appeals in the instant cause: one by plaintiff from the granting of defendants’ motions for a new trial after judgment for plaintiff on his action for damages, and one by defendant Richfield from the verdicts for plaintiff and for cross-defendant Kurtin on Richfield’s cross-complaint seeking indemnity.

The complaint alleged serious and permanent injuries to plaintiff as the result of negligence on the part of defendants, and the prayer sought substantial damages. The cross-complaint sought indemnity. The actions were tried to a jury. In the main action, a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Weeks v. Baker & McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Bostrom v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. In Re Coupon Clearing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Waller v. TJD, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Celli v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API