Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Fong

California Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1951No. Docket Nos. S.F. 18230, 18231PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the concurrent negligence of defendants Holmes, Fong, and Antisdale. Plaintiff alleged that Fong and Antisdale were acting as agents of defendant Presbytery of San Francisco. The jury exonerated defendant Holmes, but returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $41,500 against defendants Fong, Antisdale, and the Presbytery of San Francisco. On motion of defendant Presbytery, the trial court entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict as to it. Defendant Antisdale’s motion for new trial was…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  4. Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API