Legal Opinion
In Re Dickerson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1995No. OSB 94-76, 94-77, 94-78; SC S42276PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a de novo review of a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. ORS 9.536; Bar Rules of Procedure (BR) 10.1 and 10.6. The Oregon State Bar (the Bar) filed a formal complaint against the accused, charging him with multiple violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility and ORS 9.527(4) (willful deceit or misconduct in the legal profession), arising out of his handling of three clients’ cases. The Bar’s complaint also charged the accused with three violations of DR 1-103(C) (duty to cooperate). The accused did not respond to the Bar’s complaint.
The trial panel granted the Bar’s motion for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re WhippleOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReckerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SpiesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re ClaussenOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SousaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re BourcierOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re BourcierOregon Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.