In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Spies
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary case, we review de novo the decision of a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board to disbar the accused. ORS 9.536; 1 BR 10.6. 2
Over a two-year period beginning in the fall of 1989, numerous complaints were filed with the Oregon State Bar regarding the conduct of the accused, an experienced land use lawyer with no prior disciplinary record. Several complaints were lodged by clients, two by judges, one by opposing counsel, and one by the State Lawyers Assistance Committee (SLAC).
The accused repeatedly met the Bar’s attempts to investigate the accusations leveled by her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChandlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ArbuckleOregon Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re WhippleOregon Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.