Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Spies

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1993No. OSB 89-57; 90-90; 90-117; 90-118; 91-38; 91-176; 91-177; SC S38996PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary case, we review de novo the decision of a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board to disbar the accused. ORS 9.536; 1 BR 10.6. 2

Over a two-year period beginning in the fall of 1989, numerous complaints were filed with the Oregon State Bar regarding the conduct of the accused, an experienced land use lawyer with no prior disciplinary record. Several complaints were lodged by clients, two by judges, one by opposing counsel, and one by the State Lawyers Assistance Committee (SLAC).

The accused repeatedly met the Bar’s attempts to investigate the accusations leveled by her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChandlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ArbuckleOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re WhippleOregon Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API