Legal Opinion
In Re Whipple
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1994No. OSB 91-174, 91-175, 92-23, 92-24, 93-55, 93-57; SC 29728PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary case, the Oregon State Bar received complaints concerning the accused’s handling of legal matters involving several different clients. The Bar thereafter brought the present proceeding against the accused, charging 23 violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The most serious charges are that the accused violated Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) 1 in several instances. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found the accused guilty of 16 violations of the disciplinary rules, including three violations of DR 1-102(A)(3) by dishonestly and intentionally…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. McGrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.