Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Claussen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1996No. OSB 91-145; SC S42174PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a de novo review of a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. ORS 9.536(3); Bar Rules of Procedure (BR) 10.6. The Oregon State Bar (Bar) filed a formal complaint against the accused alleging, in three causes of complaint, multiple violations of the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility (DR) and ORS 9.460(2) in connection with his representation of certain clients in a bankruptcy proceeding and a related matter. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused had violated DR 5-105(E) (current client conflicts) 1 and DR 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DinermanOregon Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of WittemyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API