Legal Opinion

In Re Bourcier

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1997No. OSB 96-37; SC S42594PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (the Bar) alleges that the accused violated Disciplinary Rule (DR) 6-101(B) (neglecting a legal matter entrusted to a lawyer) and DR 1-103(C) (failing to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation). A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found the accused guilty of violating both disciplinary rules and disbarred him.

Because the sanction exceeds a 60-day suspension, this court must review the trial panel’s decision. OSB Rules of Procedure (BR) 10.1. This matter is before the court on the record, without oral argument or briefing.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaints as to the Conduct of WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HerefordOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChandlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MilesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In re BertoniOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API