Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paulson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 2009No. OSB 05-187, 06-05, 07-19, 07-20, 07-21, 07-22; SC S055610PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar, alleging 13 causes of complaint, charged the accused with violating provisions of the Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DRs) (applicable to conduct before January 1, 2005) and the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct (RPCs) (applicable to conduct on and after January 1, 2005). Specifically, the Bar alleged that the accused violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and RPC 8.4(a)(4) (conduct prejudicial to administration of justice); DR 2-106(A) (charging a clearly excessive fee); RPC 1.16(a)(1) (failure to withdraw from…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Clay MendezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HostetterOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HartfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.