Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paulson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2010No. OSB 05-187, 06-05, 07-19, 07-20, 07-21, 07-22; SC S055610PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

On the court’s own motion, the court recalls the appellate judgment and allows reconsideration in this case to modify a portion of our prior opinion, In re Paulson, 346 Or 676, 216 P3d 859 (2009). In that opinion, we concluded, as had the trial panel, that the accused had violated DR 2-106(a) by charging an excessive fee in connection with the Brady-Aiello small estate matter. After describing the pertinent facts and quoting relevant portions of the trial panel opinion, we explained:

“DR 2-106(A) prohibits a lawyer from charging an illegal or clearly excessive fee. The Bar alleged and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Clay MendezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HostetterOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HartfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re No.Oregon Supreme Court · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API