Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Clay Mendez

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 5, 2014No. 14–0426PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board brought a complaint against Richard Clay Mendez, charging numerous violations of Iowa’s disciplinary rules. Mendez is not licensed to practice law in Iowa but acquired a Des Moines-based immigration practice and represented Iowa residents in federal immigration proceedings. A division of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa determined Mendez violated certain rules governing trust accounts, fees, referrals, conflicts of interest, and neglect. The commission, with one member not participating in its…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Scott RhinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Kenneth Osborne ArySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Larry Alan StollerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Hocine SaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Blake D. LubinusSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Anthony Zane BlessumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API